Here’s a bold statement: In a world where political transitions often mean starting from scratch, Ghana’s Education Minister, Haruna Iddrisu, is making waves by promising continuity. But here’s where it gets controversial—he’s not just pledging to carry forward projects from the previous government; he’s openly praising their initiatives. Is this a refreshing commitment to national progress, or a risky move that could spark political backlash? Let’s dive in.
During the inauguration of a 160-bed dormitory and a 24-unit girls’ sanitary facility at Bimbilla Senior High School in the Northern Region on November 2, 2025, Minister Iddrisu made it clear: the current administration, led by President John Dramani Mahama, is dedicated to completing and supporting viable projects from past governments—as long as they align with Ghana’s development goals and offer value for money. This project, initially launched under the previous administration in partnership with the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), was celebrated as a significant step forward in addressing the school’s long-standing accommodation issues. Students and staff alike expressed relief and excitement, highlighting the tangible impact of such initiatives.
And this is the part most people miss—Minister Iddrisu didn’t just stop at praising the previous government’s efforts; he emphasized that continuity in governance is crucial for national progress. “President Mahama’s resetting agenda will ensure that worthy, viable initiatives from the past are not abandoned,” he stated. “If a project contributes to Ghana’s development, especially in building human capacity, we will see it through.” This approach stands in stark contrast to past practices, where projects like those funded by GETFund were often left incomplete, wasting taxpayer money and eroding public trust.
However, the Minister was quick to clarify that not all projects will get a free pass. Those deemed inefficient or lacking value for money will be reviewed. “We won’t repeat the mistakes of the past,” he asserted, criticizing the abandonment of GETFund projects as a disservice to taxpayers. This raises a thought-provoking question: How do we balance continuity with accountability? Should every project from a previous administration be continued, or is it wise to scrutinize them for efficiency?
Here’s where it gets even more intriguing—while the Minister’s commitment to continuity is commendable, it comes at a time when unemployed teacher trainees are threatening protests ahead of the 2026 budget presentation. Could this be a strategic move to build public goodwill, or is it a genuine shift in governance philosophy? We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments. Do you think this approach will lead to sustainable development, or is it a political gamble? Let’s spark a conversation!
